Immune efficacy of first and repeat trivalent influenza vaccine in healthy subjects and hemodialysis patients

12Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Influenza vaccination is recommended to patients from groups at risk and to healthy persons alike. It is not completely clear whether persons vaccinated every year benefit more from the vaccination in any given season in comparison with those who are vaccinated for the first time. The aim of the study was to analyze whether influenza vaccination in previous seasons influences the response to ongoing vaccination in the healthy population and in hemodialyzed patients. The outcome measure was the production of anti-hemagglutinin antibodies in 71 hemodialyzed patients (Group A) and 63 patients of primary healthcare clinic, without chronic renal failure (Group B). The patients of these two groups were subdivided into never vaccinated before and previously vaccinated against influenza. After the current vaccination, significantly lower levels of anti-A/H1N1/antibodies were found in the hemodialyzed compared with non-hemodialyzed previously vaccinated, but not unvaccinated, patients. The hemodialyzed patients, previously unvaccinated, had at baseline significantly lower levels of anti-A/H3N2/and anti-B antibodies than those who were previously vaccinated; the differences were no longer significant after the current vaccination. We conclude that although antiflu immunization in previous seasons leads to higher baseline antibody titers in hemodialysis compromised patients, which is less evident in non-hemodialyzed patients, it is of little influence on the immunoresponse to current influenza vaccination, in both hemodialyzed and non-hemodialyzed patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mastalerz-Migas, A., Bujnowska-Fedak, M., & Brydak, L. B. (2015). Immune efficacy of first and repeat trivalent influenza vaccine in healthy subjects and hemodialysis patients. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 836, 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2014_36

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free