How, when, why in magnetic resonance arthrography: An international survey by the European society of musculoskeletal radiology (ESSR)

45Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives To perform an online survey about the use of magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) in clinical practice. Methods We administered an online survey to all 1,550 members of the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) aboutMRA asking ten different questions. Subgroup analysis was performed between general and orthopaedic hospitals using χ2 and Mann-Whitney U statistics. Results One-hundred forty-eight answers were included (148/1,550, 9.5% of ESSR members). A median of 3,000 (interquartile range: 1,567.5-5,324.5) musculoskeletal MR examinations and a median of 125.5 MRAs (50.75-249) per institution were performed in 2016. Ratio between MRA and musculoskeletal MR was 4.7% (1.6%-9.0%). Using MRA, the most investigated joint was the shoulder followed by the hip (96.6%). The most common indications were the evaluation of instability, labrum, and rotator cuff (85.1%). Fluoroscopy represented the preferred injection guidance. A self-prepared mixture of Gadolinium/saline is preferred in general hospitals, while pre-diluted Gadolinium-based syringes are mainly used in orthopaedic hospitals (P=.010). The number of MRA performed at orthopaedic hospitals (284;83.75-449.50) was higher (P=.006) than that performed at general hospitals (115.50;44.75-234.25). Conclusions One out of twenty MR examinations is a MRA, with higher prevalence in orthopaedic hospitals. The shoulder and the hip are the most investigated joints. Instability, labrum, and cuff are the most common indications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sconfienza, L. M., Albano, D., Messina, C., Silvestri, E., & Tagliafico, A. S. (2018). How, when, why in magnetic resonance arthrography: An international survey by the European society of musculoskeletal radiology (ESSR). European Radiology, 28(6), 2356–2368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5208-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free