One-year outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction during the COVID-19 pandemic

16Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The pandemic has led to adverse short-term outcomes for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). It is unknown if this translates to poorer long-term outcomes. In Singapore, the escalation of the outbreak response on February 7, 2020 demanded adaptation of STEMI care to stringent infection control measures. A total of 321 patients presenting with STEMI and undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention at a tertiary hospital were enrolled and followed up over 1-year. They were allocated into three groups based on admission date—(1) Before outbreak response (BOR): December 1, 2019–February 6, 2020, (2) During outbreak response (DOR): February 7–March 31, 2020, and (3) control group: November 1–December 31, 2018. The incidence of cardiac-related mortality, cardiac-related readmissions, and recurrent coronary events were examined. Although in-hospital outcomes were worse in BOR and DOR groups compared to the control group, there were no differences in the 1-year cardiac-related mortality (BOR 8.7%, DOR 7.1%, control 4.8%, p = 0.563), cardiac-related readmissions (BOR 15.1%, DOR 11.6%, control 12.0%, p = 0.693), and recurrent coronary events (BOR 3.2%, DOR 1.8%, control 1.2%, p = 0.596). There were higher rates of additional PCI during the index admission in DOR, compared to BOR and control groups (p = 0.027). While patients admitted for STEMI during the pandemic may have poorer in-hospital outcomes, their long-term outcomes remain comparable to the pre-pandemic era.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Phua, K., Chew, N. W. S., Sim, V., Zhang, A. A., Rastogi, S., Kojodjojo, P., … Loh, P. H. (2022). One-year outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 53(2), 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-021-02557-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free