Binary search trees: How low can you go?

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We prove that no algorithm for balanced binary search trees performing insertions and deletions in amortized time O(f(n)) can guarantee a height smaller than ⌈log(n + 1) + 1/f(n)⌉ for all n. We improve the existing upper bound to ⌈log(n + 1) + log2 (f(n))/f(n)⌉, thus almost matching our lower bound. We also improve the existing upper bound for worst case algorithms, and give a lower bound for the semi-dynamic case.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fagerberg, R. (1996). Binary search trees: How low can you go? In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 1097, pp. 440–451). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61422-2_151

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free