Disruption vs. evolution in laboratory medicine. Current challenges and possible strategies, making laboratories and the laboratory specialist profession fit for the future

11Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Since beginning of medical diagnostics, laboratory specialists have done an amazing job, continuously improving quality, spectrum and speed of laboratory tests, currently contributing to the majority of medical decision making. These improvements are mostly of an incremental evolutionary fashion, meaning improvements of current processes. Sometimes these evolutionary innovations are of a radical fashion, such as the invention of automated analyzers replacing manual testing or the implementation of mass spectrometry, leading to one big performance leap instead of several small ones. In few cases innovations may be of disruptive nature. In laboratory medicine this would be applicable to digitalization of medicine or the decoding of the human genetic material. Currently, laboratory medicine is again facing disruptive innovations or technologies, which need to be adapted to as soon as possible. One of the major disruptive technologies is the increasing availability and medical use of artificial intelligence. It is necessary to rethink the position of the laboratory specialist within healthcare settings and the added value he or she can provide to patient care. The future of the laboratory specialist profession is bright, as it the only medical profession comprising such vast experience in patient diagnostics. However, laboratory specialists need to develop strategies to provide this expertise, by adopting to the quickly evolving technologies and demands. This opinion paper summarizes some of the disruptive technologies as well as strategies to secure and/or improve the quality of diagnostic patient care and the laboratory specialist profession.

References Powered by Scopus

High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence

3676Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US

2256Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The concept of information overload: A review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines

1319Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Where is laboratory medicine headed in the next decade? Partnership model for efficient integration and adoption of artificial intelligence into medical laboratories

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The preanalytical phase - From an instrument-centred to a patient-centred laboratory medicine

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Laboratory Medicine: From just testing to saving lives

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cadamuro, J. (2023). Disruption vs. evolution in laboratory medicine. Current challenges and possible strategies, making laboratories and the laboratory specialist profession fit for the future. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 61(4), 558–566. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-0620

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

44%

Researcher 4

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 6

43%

Computer Science 3

21%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 3

21%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0