Inpatient Rehabilitation Units: Age and Comorbidities Are Not Relevant if Admission Fits the Mission

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The aging and disability epidemics are pressing the health-care system for the appropriate allocation of resources for the expensive inpatient rehabilitation. The key point is deciding whether old age and the associated comorbidities should determine the assignment to “geriatric” or “geriatric rehabilitation” units or to nursing homes provided with some rehabilitation services, rather than to specific hospital rehabilitation units. An extensive international epidemiologic research, based on sophisticated models of case-mix classification including demographic, biomedical, and disability indexes, showed that age and comorbidities are, themselves, not major determinants of the outcome in rehabilitation units. However, the core aspect is the admission policy. In the reality, admissions at rehabilitation units require a prognosis for (a) functional improvement in the short midterm (1–12 months) and (b) need and tolerance for specific motor, cognitive, and visceral-sphincteric exercise treatments. Units can be differentiated in order to fit the needs of long stay-low-tolerance cases of any age, yet retaining their rehabilitation identity. Downstream a correct admission, elderly/comorbid patients may benefit from specific rehabilitation units not less than younger patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tesio, L. (2018). Inpatient Rehabilitation Units: Age and Comorbidities Are Not Relevant if Admission Fits the Mission. In Practical Issues in Geriatrics (pp. 521–529). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57406-6_54

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free