Goodness-of-fit tests for correlated paired binary data

18Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We review a few popular statistical models for correlated binary outcomes, present maximum likelihood estimates for the model parameters, and discuss model selection issues using a variety of goodness-of-fit test statistics. We apply bootstrap strategies that are computationally efficient to evaluate the performance of goodness-of-fit statistics and observe that generally the power and the type I error rate of the goodness-of-fit statistics depend on the model under investigation. Our simulation results show that careful choice of goodness-of-fit statistics is an important issue especially when we have a small sample and the outcomes are highly correlated. Two biomedical applications are included. © The Author(s) 2010 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.

References Powered by Scopus

A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification

41018Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection

8952Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

High-dose versus low-dose D-penicillamine in early diffuse systemic sclerosis: Analysis of a two-year, double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial

300Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A cucurbit androecy gene reveals how unisexual flowers develop and dioecy emerges

195Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Testing homogeneity of proportion ratios for stratified correlated bilateral data in two-arm randomized clinical trials

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Homogeneity Test of Ratio of Two Proportions in Stratified Bilateral Data

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tang, M. L., Pei, Y. B., Wong, W. K., & Li, J. L. (2012). Goodness-of-fit tests for correlated paired binary data. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 21(4), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280210381176

Readers over time

‘10‘13‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

36%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Researcher 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 4

36%

Social Sciences 3

27%

Design 2

18%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

18%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0