An assessment of occupational health care in the Netherlands (1996-2005)

5Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The extensive Dutch occupational health care system of the past decade has not led to the desired outcomes, namely, a decrease of work absenteeism and the associated costs. Aim: To assess the differences between in-house and external occupational health care services in the process quality of occupational health care provided. Methods: In total, 26 interviews were conducted with chief executive officers of occupational health services (OHS). The responses and other relevant policy documents were analysed and described. A key component of this process was to compare differences between in-house and external services. Results: Notable differences in quality were found to exist between in-house and external occupational health care systems, with the in-house occupational health care services offering the highest process quality. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the effectiveness of OHS is mainly dependent on their structure (in-house versus external) and on economic factors (profit driven versus not for profit). © 2006 Oxford University Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Valk, M. M. A., Oostrom, C., & Schrijvers, A. J. P. (2006). An assessment of occupational health care in the Netherlands (1996-2005). Occupational Medicine, 56(7), 475–479. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kql074

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free