Patient Dose Comparison for Intraoperative Imaging Devices Used in Orthopaedic Lumbar Spinal Surgery

6Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the amount of radiation exposure from intraoperative imaging during two-level and four-level lumbar fusions. Methods: Five imaging systems were studied: multidetector CT (MDCT) scanner (CT A); two mobile CT units (CT B and CT C); a C-arm (D); and fluoroscopy (E). Metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor dosimeters measured doses at 25 organ locations using an anthropomorphic phantom. A fat-equivalent phantom was used to simulate an obese body mass index (BMI). Results: The effective dose (ED) for C-arm D was estimated using commercial software. The ED for others was computed from the measured mean organ doses. EDs for a normal BMI patient, receiving a four-level fusion, are as follows: CT A (12.00 ± 0.30 mSv), CT B (5.90 ± 0.25 mSv), CT C (2.35 ± 0.44 mSv), C-arm D (0.44 mSv), and fluoroscopy E (0.30 ± 0.3 mSv). The rankings are consistent across all three BMI values except CT C and fluoroscopy E, which peaked in the overweight size because of system limitations. The other machines' ED trended with patient BMI. Conclusion: The dose reduction protocols were confirmed according to the manufacturer's specifications. The results of this study emphasize the need for the appropriate selection of the imaging system, especially because the type of device could have a substantial effect on patient radiation risk.

References Powered by Scopus

The association between obesity and low back pain: A meta-analysis

632Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Disc degeneration of the lumbar spine in relation to overweight

329Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Intraoperative cone beam-computed tomography with navigation (O-ARM) versus conventional fluoroscopy (C-ARM): A cadaveric study comparing accuracy, efficiency, and safety for spinal instrumentation

116Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

State of the art advances in minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Image Quality and Dose Comparison of 3 Mobile Intraoperative Three-Dimensional Imaging Systems in Spine Surgery

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effective dose and image quality for intraoperative imaging with a cone-beam CT and a mobile multi-slice CT in spinal surgery: A phantom study

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moore, B., Womack, K. R., Nguyen, G., Foster, N., Richardson, W., & Yoshizumi, T. (2018). Patient Dose Comparison for Intraoperative Imaging Devices Used in Orthopaedic Lumbar Spinal Surgery. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews, 2(7). https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-18-00030

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 2

33%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

33%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

17%

Neuroscience 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free