A Comparison of Two Equivalent Real Formulations for Complex-Valued Linear Systems Part 2: Results

  • Munankarmy A
  • Heroux M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Many iterative linear solver packages focus on real-valued systems and do not deal well with complex-valued systems, even though preconditioned iterative methods typically apply to both real and complex-valued linear systems. Instead, commonly available packages such as PETSc and Aztec tend to focus on the real-valued systems, while complex-valued systems are seen as a late addition. At the same time, by changing the complex problem into an equivalent real formulation (ERF), a real valued solver can be used. In this paper we consider two ERF’s that can be used to solve complex-valued linear systems. We investigate the spectral properties of each and show how each can be preconditioned to move eigenvalues in a cloud around the point (1,0) in the complex plane. Finally, we consider an interleaved formulation, combining each of the previously mentioned approaches, and show that the interleaved form achieves a better outcome than either separate ERF. [This article is the second part of a sequence of reports. See the December 2002 issue for Part 1—Editor.]

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Munankarmy, A., & Heroux, M. (2003). A Comparison of Two Equivalent Real Formulations for Complex-Valued Linear Systems Part 2: Results. American Journal of Undergraduate Research, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.33697/ajur.2003.005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free