Combination treatment in M1 prostate cancer

23Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The treatment of advanced prostate cancer is based on hormone manipulation to eliminate the trophic effect of testosterone on sensitive androgen tissue of the tumor. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of the partial androgen blockage versus the complete androgen blockage. One hundred, twenty‐two patients were entered in this study and randomly were treated with buserelin alone or with buserelin and flutamide. The group that received buserelin was given cyproterone acetate (200 mg/day) during first 3 weeks of treatment to avoid “flare‐up”. During the follow‐up (range 0‐244 ± 1 weeks), we evaluated 59 patients (61.4%) that had positive response and 37 patients (38.6%) that showed progressive disease: There were no statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups, not even in the evaluation of median time to response and of median time to treatment failure. In conclusion, the results emphasize that total androgenic blockage is as effective as a luteinizing hormone‐releasing hormone analog used alone. Copyright © 1993 American Cancer Society

References Powered by Scopus

A Controlled Trial of Leuprolide with and without Flutamide in Prostatic Carcinoma

1379Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

New approach in the treatment of prostate cancer: Complete instead of partial withdrawal of androgens

224Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quantitative studies of prostatic secretion: Ii. The effect of castration and of estrogen injection on the normal and on the hyperplastic prostate glands of dogs

184Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ferrari, P., Castagnetti, G., Ferrari, G., Pollastri, C. A., Tavoni, F., & Dotti, A. (1993). Combination treatment in M1 prostate cancer. Cancer, 72(12 S), 3880–3885. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19931215)72:12+<3880::AID-CNCR2820721724>3.0.CO;2-4

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

75%

Researcher 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 2

40%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

20%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

20%

Sports and Recreations 1

20%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free