Source-specific pollution exposure and associations with pulmonary response in the Atlanta Commuters Exposure Studies article

17Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Concentrations of traffic-related air pollutants are frequently higher within commuting vehicles than in ambient air. Pollutants found within vehicles may include those generated by tailpipe exhaust, brake wear, and road dust sources, as well as pollutants from in-cabin sources. Source-specific pollution, compared to total pollution, may represent regulation targets that can better protect human health. We estimated source-specific pollution exposures and corresponding pulmonary response in a panel study of commuters. We used constrained positive matrix factorization to estimate source-specific pollution factors and, subsequently, mixed effects models to estimate associations between source-specific pollution and pulmonary response. We identified four pollution factors that we named: crustal, primary tailpipe traffic, non-tailpipe traffic, and secondary. Among asthmatic subjects (N = 48), interquartile range increases in crustal and secondary pollution were associated with changes in lung function of -1.33% (95% confidence interval (CI): -2.45, -0.22) and -2.19% (95% CI: -3.46, -0.92) relative to baseline, respectively. Among non-asthmatic subjects (N = 51), non-tailpipe pollution was associated with pulmonary response only at 2.5 h post-commute. We found no significant associations between pulmonary response and primary tailpipe pollution. Health effects associated with traffic-related pollution may vary by source, and therefore some traffic pollution sources may require targeted interventions to protect health.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Krall, J. R., Ladva, C. N., Russell, A. G., Golan, R., Peng, X., Shi, G., … Sarnat, J. A. (2018). Source-specific pollution exposure and associations with pulmonary response in the Atlanta Commuters Exposure Studies article. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology, 28(4), 337–347. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-017-0016-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free