Validation of a transcutaneous CO 2 monitor in adult patients with chronic respiratory failure

24Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Home mechanical ventilation is usually started in hospital as arterial blood gas sampling is deemed necessary to monitor CO 2 and O 2 adequately during institution of ventilatory support. A non-invasive device to reliably measure CO 2 transcutaneously would alleviate the need for high care settings for measurement and open the possibility for home registration. Objectives: In this study we investigated whether the TOSCA® transcutaneous CO 2 (PtcCO 2) measurements, performed continuously during the night, reliably reflect arterial CO 2 (PaCO 2) measurements in adults with chronic respiratory failure. Methods: Paired measurements were taken in 15 patients hospitalised to evaluate their blood gas exchange. Outcomes were compared 30 min, 2, 4, 6 and 8 h after attaching the sensor to the earlobe. A maximum difference of 1.0 kPa and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) of 1 kPa between CO 2 pressure measurements, following the analysis by Bland and Altman, were determined as acceptable. Results: Mean PtcCO 2 was 0.4 kPa higher (LOA -0.48 to 1.27 kPa) than mean PaCO 2 after 30 min. These figures were 0.6 kPa higher (LOA -0.60 to 1.80 kPa) after 4 h, with a maximum of 0.72 kPa (LOA 0.35 to 1.79 kPa) after 8 h. The corresponding values for changes in PtcCO 2 versus PaCO 2 were not significant (ANOVA). Conclusions: PtcCO 2 measurement, using TOSCA, is a valid method showing an acceptable agreement with PaCO 2 during 8 h of continuous measurement. Therefore, this device can be used to monitor CO 2 adequately during chronic ventilatory support. Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hazenberg, A., Zijlstra, J. G., Kerstjens, H. A. M., & Wijkstra, P. J. (2011). Validation of a transcutaneous CO 2 monitor in adult patients with chronic respiratory failure. Respiration, 81(3), 242–246. https://doi.org/10.1159/000323074

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free