Do-not-resuscitate orders, unintended consequences, and the ripple effect

41Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders are commonly implemented in the critical care setting as a prelude to end-of-life care. This is often based on presumed prognosis for favorable outcome and interpretation of patient, family, and even physician wishes. While DNR orders explicitly apply only to an individual patient, the hospital culture and milieu in which DNR orders are implemented could potentially have an overall impact on aggressiveness of care across patients. As illustrated by the example of intracerebral hemorrhage, this may unexpectedly influence outcome even in patients without DNR orders in place. © 2007 BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hemphill, J. C. (2007, March 2). Do-not-resuscitate orders, unintended consequences, and the ripple effect. Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc5687

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free