Decision Theory Without “Independence” or Without “Ordering”

  • Seidenfeld T
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The goal of this essay is to help sort out the differences between these two strategies (Independence and Orderign) for generalizing expected-utility theory (EU). I argue in Section 4 that abandoning independence leads to an incoherence in sequential decisions. As Levi (1986a, 1986b, 1987) asserts and as 1 outline reasons for in Section 5, one can avoid this incoherence while relaxing ordering. Thus, the criterion of avoiding a sure loss in sequential deci- sions provides the needed demarcation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Seidenfeld, T. (2016). Decision Theory Without “Independence” or Without “Ordering.” In Readings in Formal Epistemology (pp. 361–384). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20451-2_20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free