Something is a matter of luck if it is beyond our control. In this paper, I argue for the primary thesis that luck can undermine varieties of obligation, such as moral and prudential obligation, as well as judgments that are best from an agent’s own point of view. Among the considerations invoked to defend this thesis is a prevalent form of libertarianism, event-causal libertarianism. Arguments for the primary thesis that call on event-causal libertarianism raise concerns with this variety of libertarianism.
CITATION STYLE
Haji, I. (2016). Luck’s Extended Reach. Journal of Ethics, 20(1–3), 191–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-016-9224-y
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.