Luck’s Extended Reach

0Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Something is a matter of luck if it is beyond our control. In this paper, I argue for the primary thesis that luck can undermine varieties of obligation, such as moral and prudential obligation, as well as judgments that are best from an agent’s own point of view. Among the considerations invoked to defend this thesis is a prevalent form of libertarianism, event-causal libertarianism. Arguments for the primary thesis that call on event-causal libertarianism raise concerns with this variety of libertarianism.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haji, I. (2016). Luck’s Extended Reach. Journal of Ethics, 20(1–3), 191–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-016-9224-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free