Learning relational sum-product networks

21Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Sum-product networks (SPNs) are a recently-proposed deep architecture that guarantees tractable inference, even on certain high-treewidth models. SPNs are a propositional architecture, treating the instances as independent and identically distributed. In this paper, we introduce Relational Sum-Product Networks (RSPNs), a new tractable first-order probabilistic architecture. RSPNs generalize SPNs by modeling a set of instances jointly, allowing them to influence each other's probability distributions, as well as modeling probabilities of relations between objects. We also present LearnR-SPN, the first algorithm for learning high-treewidth tractable statistical relational models. LearnRSPN is a recursive topdown structure learning algorithm for RSPNs, based on Gens and Domingos' LearnSPN algorithm for propositional SPN learning. We evaluate the algorithm on three datasets; the RSPN learning algorithm outperforms Markov Logic Networks in both running time and predictive accuracy.

References Powered by Scopus

Emergence of scaling in random networks

29229Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fast unfolding of communities in large networks

15254Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Markov logic networks

2166Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Learning and reasoning with logic tensor networks

65Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sum-Product Networks: A Survey

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Neural-Symbolic Learning and Reasoning: A Survey and Interpretation

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nath, A., & Domingos, P. (2015). Learning relational sum-product networks. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 4, pp. 2878–2886). AI Access Foundation. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v29i1.9538

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘220481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 32

67%

Researcher 11

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 44

88%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

4%

Psychology 2

4%

Mathematics 2

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0