Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques

444Citations
Citations of this article
730Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Traditional methods for flow cytometry (FCM) data processing rely on subjective manual gating. Recently, several groups have developed computational methods for identifying cell populations in multidimensional FCM data. The Flow Cytometry: Critical Assessment of Population Identification Methods (FlowCAP) challenges were established to compare the performance of these methods on two tasks: (i) mammalian cell population identification, to determine whether automated algorithms can reproduce expert manual gating and (ii) sample classification, to determine whether analysis pipelines can identify characteristics that correlate with external variables (such as clinical outcome). This analysis presents the results of the first FlowCAP challenges. Several methods performed well as compared to manual gating or external variables using statistical performance measures, which suggests that automated methods have reached a sufficient level of maturity and accuracy for reliable use in FCM data analysis. © 2013 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aghaeepour, N., Finak, G., Hoos, H., Mosmann, T. R., Brinkman, R., Gottardo, R., … Vilar, J. M. G. (2013). Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques. Nature Methods, 10(3), 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1038/NMETH.2365

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free