Poor accuracy of freehand cup positioning during total hip arthroplasty

128Citations
Citations of this article
99Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Several studies have demonstrated a correlation between the acetabular cup position and the risk of dislocation, wear and range of motion after total hip arthroplasty. The present study was designed to evaluate the accuracy of the surgeon's estimated position of the cup after freehand placement in total hip replacement. Peroperative estimated abduction and anteversion of 200 acetabular components (placed by three orthopaedic surgeons and nine residents) were compared with measured outcomes (according to Pradhan) on postoperative radiographs. Cups were placed in 49.7° (SD 6.7) of abduction and 16.0° (SD 8.1) of anteversion. Estimation of placement was 46.3° (SD 4.3) of abduction and 14.6° (SD 5.9) of anteversion. Of more interest is the fact that for the orthopaedic surgeons the mean inaccuracy of estimation was 4.1° (SD 3.9) for abduction and 5.2° (SD 4.5) for anteversion and for their residents this was respectively, 6.3° (SD 4.6) and 5.7° (SD 5.0). Significant differences were found between orthopaedic surgeons and residents for inaccuracy of estimation for abduction, not for anteversion. Body mass index, sex, (un)cemented fixation and surgical approach (anterolateral or posterolateral) were not significant factors. Based upon the inaccuracy of estimation, the group's chance on future cup placement within Lewinnek's safe zone (5-25° anteversion and 30-50° abduction) is 82.7 and 85.2% for anteversion and abduction separately. When both parameters are combined, the chance of accurate placement is only 70.5%. The chance of placement of the acetabular component within 5° of an intended position, for both abduction and anteversion is 21.5% this percentage decreases to just 2.9% when the tolerated error is 1°. There is a tendency to underestimate both abduction and anteversion. Orthopaedic surgeons are superior to their residents in estimating abduction of the acetabular component. The results of this study indicate that freehand placement of the acetabular component is not a reliable method. © Springer-Verlag 2007.

References Powered by Scopus

Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties

2391Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: Causes and prevention

535Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion

482Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The john charnley award: Risk factors for cup malpositioning: Quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital

478Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Accuracy of acetabular component position in hip arthroplasty

150Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Redefining the Acetabular Component Safe Zone for Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty

114Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bosker, B. H., Verheyen, C. C. P. M., Horstmann, W. G., & Tulp, N. J. A. (2007). Poor accuracy of freehand cup positioning during total hip arthroplasty. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 127(5), 375–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0294-y

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 35

57%

Researcher 21

34%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

5%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 49

68%

Engineering 16

22%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

6%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0