Lessons from initiating the first Veterans Health Administration (VA) Women's Health Practicebased Research Network (WH-PBRN) study

13Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The Veterans Health Administration (VA) Women's Health Practice-Based Research Network (WH-PBRN) was created to foster innovations for the health care of women veterans. The inaugural study by the WH-PBRN was designed to identify women veterans' own priorities and preferences for mental health services and to inform refinements to WH-PBRN operational procedures. Addressing the latter, this article reports lessons learned from the inaugural study. Methods: WH-PBRN site coordinators at the 4 participating sites convened weekly with the study coordinator and the WH-PBRN program manager to address logistical issues and identify lessons learned. Findings were categorized into a matrix of challenges and facilitators related to key study elements. Results: Challenges to the conduct of PBRN-based research included tracking of regulatory documents; cross-site variability in some regulatory processes; and troubleshooting logistics of clinic-based recruitment. Facilitators included a central institutional review board, strong relationships between WH-PBRN research teams and women's health clinic teams, and the perception that women want to help other women veterans. Conclusion: Our experience with the inaugural WH-PBRN study demonstrated the feasibility of establishing productive relationships between local clinicians and researchers, and of recruiting a special population (women veterans) in diverse sites within an integrated health care system. This identified strengths of a PBRN approach.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pomernacki, A., Carney, D. V., Kimerling, R., Nazarian, D., Blakeney, J., Martin, B. D., … Frayne, S. M. (2015). Lessons from initiating the first Veterans Health Administration (VA) Women’s Health Practicebased Research Network (WH-PBRN) study. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 28(5), 649–657. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2015.05.150029

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free