After the legal landscape in neurosciences has been described for the individual countries, the last chapter is to give an overview on the most common topics connected to neurolaw. As so far none of the countries has established a genuine neurolaw, it seems to be the major challenge for the near future to try and apply existing regulations on neurosciences.
CITATION STYLE
Wegmann, H. (2013). Summary: Neurolaw in an international comparison. In International Neurolaw: A Comparative Analysis (pp. 381–411). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21541-4_20
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.