Comparison of Anti-GBM Antibodies in Sera with or without ANCA

136Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

An appreciable percentage of patients with serum anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) antibodies also have antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA), against either myeloperoxidase (MPO-ANCA), or proteinase 3 (PR3-ANCA). In sera without ANCA, the anti-GBM antibodies have been shown to react mainly with the noncollagenous domain (NC1) of Type IV collagen, and especially with its α3 chain, α3(IV)NC1. In most sera, the antibodies can be partially blocked by a monoclonal antibody (Mab17) against α3(IV)NC1, suggesting that a limited region is recognized. Although there is evidence that some anti-GBM antibodies that coexist with ANCA react with α3(IV)NC1, extensive analysis of the specificity of such anti-GBM antibodies has not been reported. In the study presented here, sera were analyzed from 332 patients tested both for anti-GBM antibodies and ANCA (MPO or PR3-ANCA) and found to have one or more positive tests. Of the 100 sera with anti-GBM antibodies, 38 also had ANCA-25 with MPO-ANCA (66%), 12 with PR3-ANCA (32%), and one with both (2%). Of the 232 sera with ANCA only, 153 had MPO-ANCA (66%), 75 had PR3-ANCA (32%), and four had both (2%). Sera was also analyzed from 259 other patients who had positive ANCA tests and were not tested for anti-GBM antibodies: 138 had MPO-ANCA (54%), and 121 had PR3-ANCA (46%). The relative frequencies of MPO or PR3-ANCA in patients with coexisting anti-GBM antibodies did not differ significantly from those in all patients with ANCA (P = 0.35). Seventeen sera with anti-GBM antibodies only and 16 sera with anti-GBM antibodies plus ANCA were selected for further studies to compare the specificity of anti-GBM antibodies in sera with or without ANCA. Using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), all sera in both groups were found to react with the NC1 domain (as a hexamer) of bovine Type IV collagen and with α3(IV)NC1 monomers. Furthermore, all but six sera also reacted with one or more of the α1, 2, and 4 (IV)NC1 monomers, generally with considerably lower titers. Reactivity to α3(IV)NC1 was partially blocked by Mab17, with comparable degrees of inhibition in both groups. Western blot analysis with the human NC1 domains revealed no differences in reactivity between the two groups. Thus, differences in antigen specificities of anti-GBM antibodies in sera with or without ANCA were not detected. The anti-GBM response in both situations is hypothesized to be driven by the same immunogen, which is probably derived from NC1 domains of endogenous Type IV collagen.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hellmark, T., Niles, J. L., Collins, A. B., Mccluskey, R. T., & Brunmark, C. (1997). Comparison of Anti-GBM Antibodies in Sera with or without ANCA. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 8(3), 376–385. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.v83376

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free