Is current body temperature measurement practice fit-for-purpose?

13Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There has been a marked rise in the number of avoidable deaths in health services around the world. At the same time there has been a growing increase in antibiotic resistant so-called “superbugs.” We examine here the potential role of body temperature measurement in these adverse trends. Electronic based thermometers have replaced traditional mercury (and other liquid-in-glass type) thermometers for reasons of safety rather than superiority. Electronic thermometers are in general less robust from a measurement perspective than their predecessors. We illustrate the implications of unreliable temperature measurement on the diagnosis and management of disease, including COVID-19, through statistical calculations. Since a return to mercury thermometers is both undesirable and impractical, we call for better governance in the current practice of clinical thermometry to ensure the traceability and long-term accuracy of electronic thermometers and discuss how this could be achieved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Machin, G., Brettle, D., Fleming, S., Nutbrown, R., Simpson, R., Stevens, R., & Tooley, M. (2021). Is current body temperature measurement practice fit-for-purpose? Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology, 45(2), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/03091902.2021.1873441

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free