There has been a marked rise in the number of avoidable deaths in health services around the world. At the same time there has been a growing increase in antibiotic resistant so-called “superbugs.” We examine here the potential role of body temperature measurement in these adverse trends. Electronic based thermometers have replaced traditional mercury (and other liquid-in-glass type) thermometers for reasons of safety rather than superiority. Electronic thermometers are in general less robust from a measurement perspective than their predecessors. We illustrate the implications of unreliable temperature measurement on the diagnosis and management of disease, including COVID-19, through statistical calculations. Since a return to mercury thermometers is both undesirable and impractical, we call for better governance in the current practice of clinical thermometry to ensure the traceability and long-term accuracy of electronic thermometers and discuss how this could be achieved.
CITATION STYLE
Machin, G., Brettle, D., Fleming, S., Nutbrown, R., Simpson, R., Stevens, R., & Tooley, M. (2021). Is current body temperature measurement practice fit-for-purpose? Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology, 45(2), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/03091902.2021.1873441
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.