Fast programs for initial segments and polynomial time computation in weak models of arithmetic

6Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper we study two alternative approaches for investigating whether NP complete sets have fast algorithms. One is to ask whether there are long initial segments on which such sets are easily decidable by relatively short programs. The other approach is to ask whether there are weak fragments of arithmetic for which it is consistent to believe that P = NP. We show, perhaps surprisingly, that the two questions are equivalent: It is consistent to believe that P = NP in certain models of weak arithmetic theories iff it is true (in the standard model of computation) that there are infinitely many initial segments on which satisfiability is polynomially decidable by programs that are much shorter than the length of the initial segment.

References Powered by Scopus

On the Structure of Polynomial Time Reducibility

464Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sparse complete sets for NP: Solution of a conjecture of berman and hartmanis

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The consistency of "P = NP" and related problems with fragments of number theory

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

On the metamathematics of the P vs. NP question

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Independence results in computer science?

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Informal versus formal mathematics

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Joseph, D., & Young, P. (1981). Fast programs for initial segments and polynomial time computation in weak models of arithmetic. In Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (pp. 55–61). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/800076.802457

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘2301234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

64%

Researcher 2

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 10

91%

Physics and Astronomy 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0