Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Self-Stigma Scale in patients with type 2 diabetes

30Citations
Citations of this article
119Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Self-stigma has been highlighted and researched in relation to patients with chronic illnesses, as it may have a negative impact on their treatment adherence. However, self-stigma has not yet been investigated in patients with type 2 diabetes. In order to evaluate the extent to which patients with type 2 diabetes experience self-stigma, which may result in their poor self-care management, there is a need for a specific tool to measure self-stigma in patients with type 2 diabetes. This study assessed the psychometric properties of a Japanese version of the Self-Stigma Scale (SSS-J) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: The reliability and validity of the SSS-J were evaluated using a consecutive sample of 210 outpatients with type 2 diabetes from university hospitals and from hospitals or clinics specializing in diabetes treatment. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to assess the factors theorized by the original Self-Stigma Scale. Cronbach's alpha for internal reliability and Pearson's correlations for construct validity were used for evaluation of psychometric properties. Pearson's correlations for test-retest reliability of the SSS-J were also performed. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis verified the three-factor structure of the SSS-J, consisting of cognitive, affective, and behavioral subscales. The model fit indices were as follows: the goodness-of-fit index was 0.78, the adjusted goodness-of-fit index was 0.70, the comparative fit index was 0.88, and the root mean square error of approximation was 0.07. Cronbach's alpha of the SSS-J was 0.96 (cognitive: alpha = 0.92; affective: alpha = 0.93; behavioral: alpha = 0.83). The SSS-J was associated with self-esteem (r = -0.43, p < 0.01), self-efficacy (r = -0.38, p < 0.01), and depressive symptoms (r = 0.39, p < 0.01). The 2-week test-retest reliability demonstrated satisfactory stability (r = 0.76, p < 0.01). Conclusions: The SSS-J is reliable and valid for assessment of the extent of self-stigma in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

Figures

  • Figure 1 Flow chart describing the development of the Japanese version of the Self-Stigma Scale. SSS: Self-Stigma Scale.
  • Table 1 Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of participants (n = 210)
  • Table 2 Scores of items in the Japanese version of the Self-Stigma Scale in type 2 diabetes patients
  • Figure 2 Results of the confirmatory factor analysis of the Japanese v GFI: goodness-of-fit index; AGFI: adjusted GFI; CFI: comparative fit index; RM

References Powered by Scopus

Comparative fit indexes in structural models

20028Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability

19194Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: The PHQ Primary Care Study

8189Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Measuring the stigma surrounding type 2 diabetes: Development and validation of the type 2 diabetes stigma assessment scale (DSAS-2)

85Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Hacking Stigma by Loving Yourself: a Mediated-Moderation Model of Self-Compassion and Stigma

57Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Association between self-stigma and self-care behaviors in patients with type 2 diabetes: A cross-sectional study

56Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kato, A., Takada, M., & Hashimoto, H. (2014). Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Self-Stigma Scale in patients with type 2 diabetes. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-014-0179-z

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 36

61%

Researcher 14

24%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

10%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 19

35%

Psychology 16

29%

Nursing and Health Professions 12

22%

Social Sciences 8

15%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 259

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0