Drug addiction and criminal responsibility

11Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Recent studies reveal some of the neurophysiological mechanisms involved in drug addiction. This prompts some theorists to claim that drug addiction diminishes responsibility. Stephen Morse however rejects this claim. Morse argues that these studies show that drug addiction involves neither compulsion, coercion, nor irrationality. He also adds that addicted people are responsible for becoming addicted and for failing to take measures to manage their addiction. After summarizing relevant neuroscience of addiction literature, this chapter engages critically with Morse to argue that a subgroup of addicted people does meet plausible criteria for compulsion, coercion, or irrationality; that few addicted people are fully responsible for becoming addicted; and that some addicted people can be at least partly excused for failing to manage their addiction. Pickard and Lacey’s “responsibility without blame” approach is also suggested as a fruitful basis for future work in this field.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kennett, J., Vincent, N. A., & Snoek, A. (2015). Drug addiction and criminal responsibility. In Handbook of Neuroethics (pp. 1065–1084). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4707-4_71

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free