Four-Part Harmonization: Comparison of a Bayesian Network and a Recurrent Neural Network

1Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper, we compare four-part harmonization produced using two different machine learning models: a Bayesian network (BN) and a recurrent neural network (RNN). Four-part harmonization is widely known as a fundamental problem in harmonization, and various methods, especially based on probabilistic models such as a hidden Markov model, a weighted finite-state transducer, and a BN, have been proposed. Recently, a method using an RNN has also been proposed. In this paper, we conducted an experiment on four-part harmonization using the same data with both a BN and RNN and investigated the differences in the results between the models. The results show that these models have different tendencies. For example, the BN’s harmonies have less dissonance but especially the bass melodies are monotonous, while the RNN’s harmonies have more dissonance but especially bass melodies are smoother.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yamada, T., Kitahara, T., Arie, H., & Ogata, T. (2018). Four-Part Harmonization: Comparison of a Bayesian Network and a Recurrent Neural Network. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 11265 LNCS, pp. 213–225). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01692-0_15

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free