Do firms hedge in order to avoid financial distress costs? New empirical evidence using bank data

5Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We present a new approach to test empirically the financial distress costs theory of corporate hedging. We estimate the ex-ante expected financial distress costs, which serve as a starting point to construct further explanatory variables in an equilibrium setting, as a fraction of the value of an asset-or-nothing put option on the firm's assets. Using single-contract data of the derivatives' use of 189 German middle-market companies that stems from a major bank as well as Basel II default probabilities and historical accounting information, we are able to explain a significant share of the observed cross-sectional differences in hedge ratios. Hence, our analysis adds further support for the financial distress costs theory of corporate hedging from the perspective of a financial intermediary.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hahnenstein, L., Köchling, G., & Posch, P. N. (2021). Do firms hedge in order to avoid financial distress costs? New empirical evidence using bank data. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 48(3–4), 718–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12489

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free