Weak malaise with democracy in Uruguay

1Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In 2015, Uruguay completed 30 years of uninterrupted democracy, a period during which elections regularly took place and the three main political parties had a turn in government in a context of total respect for liberties and political rights. This is reflected in international rankings which identify Uruguay as one of the region’s most solid democracies.1 This privileged situation is, however, not a recent or casual phenomenon but, rather, the product of an institutional and cultural process that began in the early twentieth century and has continued through to the present day with only two interruptions of democracy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chasquetti, D. (2016). Weak malaise with democracy in Uruguay. In Malaise in Representation in Latin American Countries: Chile, Argentina, and Uruguay (pp. 161–185). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59955-1_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free