Prediction of 2-year carcinogenicity study results for pharmaceutical products: How are we doing?

56Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Some have proposed that 2-year carcinogenicity studies may not be necessary if the material is a direct-acting DNA mutagen, induces liver enzymes, causes hyperplasia or toxicity in particular organs, causes cell proliferation, is cytotoxic, causes hormonal perturbations, or if one has QSAR analyses or 'omics information. Safety pharmacology data, pharmacologic activity, metabolism data, and results of 13-week dose ranging studies (with organ weight data, clinical chemistry data, hematologic data, clinical signs and histopathologic findings) were compared with results of 2-year carcinogenicity studies reviewed by the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)/FDA. The experience with the ICH genetic toxicology battery and alternative carcinogenicity models was also reviewed. It appears that the information available from short-term studies is not currently sufficient to accurately and reliably predict the outcome of long-term carcinogenicity studies. © The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jacobs, A. (2005, November). Prediction of 2-year carcinogenicity study results for pharmaceutical products: How are we doing? Toxicological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfi248

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free