A simple cut-off for waist-to-height ratio (0·5) can act as an indicator for cardiometabolic risk: Recent data from adults in the Health Survey for England

50Citations
Citations of this article
89Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has acknowledged the value of waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) as an indicator for 'early health risk'. We used recent UK data to explore whether classification based on WHtR identifies more adults at cardiometabolic risk than the 'matrix' based on BMI and waist circumference, currently used for screening. Data from the Health Survey for England (4112 adults aged 18+ years) were used to identify cardiometabolic risk, indicated by raised glycated Hb, dyslipidaemia and hypertension. HbA1c, total/HDL-cholesterol and systolic blood pressure (BP) were more strongly associated with WHtR than the 'matrix'. In logistic regression models for HbA1c ≥ 48 mmol/mol, total/HDL-cholesterol > 4 and hypertension (BP > 140/90 mmHg or on medication), WHtR had a higher predictive value than the 'matrix'. AUC was significantly greater for WHtR than the 'matrix' for raised HbA1c and hypertension. Of adults with raised HbA1c, 15 % would be judged as 'no increased risk' using the 'matrix' in contrast to 3 % using WHtR < 0·5. For hypertension, comparative values were 23 and 9 %, and for total/HDL-cholesterol > 4, 26 and 13 %. Nearly one-third of the 'no increased risk' group in the 'matrix' had WHtR ≥ 0·5 and hence could be underdiagnosed for cardiometabolic risk. WHtR has the potential to be a better indicator of cardiometabolic risks associated with central obesity than the current NICE 'matrix'. The cut-off WHtR 0·5 in early screening translates to a simple message, 'your waist should be less than half your height', that allows individuals to be aware of their health risks.

References Powered by Scopus

A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases

6361Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Waist-to-height ratio is a better screening tool than waist circumference and BMI for adult cardiometabolic risk factors: Systematic review and meta-analysis

1473Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Indices of abdominal obesity are better discriminators of cardiovascular risk factors than BMI: a meta-analysis

912Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

EASL–EASD–EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)

297Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Triglyceride-Glucose Index and Related Parameters Predicted Metabolic Syndrome in Nigerians

88Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Relevance of body composition in phenotyping the obesities

56Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gibson, S., & Ashwell, M. (2020, March 28). A simple cut-off for waist-to-height ratio (0·5) can act as an indicator for cardiometabolic risk: Recent data from adults in the Health Survey for England. British Journal of Nutrition. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114519003301

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

54%

Researcher 8

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 11

38%

Nursing and Health Professions 10

34%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 5

17%

Sports and Recreations 3

10%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free