Downscaling down under: towards degrowth in integrated assessment models

4Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

IPCC reports, to date, have not featured ambitious mitigation scenarios with degrowth in high-income regions. Here, using MESSAGEix-Australia, we create 51 emissions scenarios for Australia with near-term GDP growth going from +3%/year to rapid reductions (−5%/year) to explore how a traditional integrated assessment model (IAM) represents degrowth from an economic starting point, not just energy demand reduction. We find that stagnating GDP per capita reduces the mid-century need for upscaling solar and wind energy by about 40% compared to the SSP2 growth baseline, and limits future material needs for renewables. Still, solar and wind energy in 2030 is more than quadruple that of 2020. Faster reductions in energy demand may entail higher socio-cultural feasibility concerns, depending on the policies involved. Strong reductions in inequality reduce the risk of lowered access to decent living services. We discuss research needs and possible IAM extensions to improve post-growth and degrowth scenario modelling.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kikstra, J. S., Li, M., Brockway, P. E., Hickel, J., Keysser, L., Malik, A., … Lenzen, M. (2024). Downscaling down under: towards degrowth in integrated assessment models. Economic Systems Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2023.2301443

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free