Investigating Self-Rationalizing Models for Commonsense Reasoning

1Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The rise of explainable natural language processing spurred a bulk of work on datasets augmented with human explanations, as well as technical approaches to leverage them. Notably, generative large language models offer new possibilities, as they can output a prediction as well as an explanation in natural language. This work investigates the capabilities of fine-tuned text-to-text transfer Transformer (T5) models for commonsense reasoning and explanation generation. Our experiments suggest that while self-rationalizing models achieve interesting results, a significant gap remains: classifiers consistently outperformed self-rationalizing models, and a substantial fraction of model-generated explanations are not valid. Furthermore, training with expressive free-text explanations substantially altered the inner representation of the model, suggesting that they supplied additional information and may bridge the knowledge gap. Our code is publicly available, and the experiments were run on open-access datasets, hence allowing full reproducibility.

References Powered by Scopus

"Why should i trust you?" Explaining the predictions of any classifier

11906Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Statistical modeling: The two cultures

3278Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences

3071Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The AI Future of Emergency Medicine

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rancourt, F., Vondrlik, P., Maupomé, D., & Meurs, M. J. (2023). Investigating Self-Rationalizing Models for Commonsense Reasoning. Stats, 6(3), 907–919. https://doi.org/10.3390/stats6030056

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

75%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 2

40%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

20%

Computer Science 1

20%

Psychology 1

20%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free