Review article: The measurement of non-acid gastro-oesophageal reflux

13Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Oesophageal pH monitoring has been used for three decades to study gastro-oesophageal reflux, but it does not allow detection of non-acid reflux episodes. Aim: To discuss the techniques by which non-acid reflux can be measured and to evaluate the clinical relevance of such measurements. Methods: Review of the literature on non-acid reflux monitoring. Results: Ambulatory oesophageal impedance monitoring (using a catheter with ring electrodes) allows one to detect all types of gastro-oesophageal reflux, acid as well as non-acid. Measurement of intra-oesophageal bilirubin concentration also detects reflux irrespective of the pH, but only when there is bilirubin in the gastric juice and technical short-comings limit the applicability of this technique. In untreated subjects, about 50% of reflux episodes are non-acid (nadir pH > 4). In patients on acid inhibition, up to 95% of reflux episodes are non-acid. Treatment with an acid inhibitor leads to a significant decrease in the incidence of acid reflux episodes, but not to a reduction in the total number of reflux episodes. This shift is associated with a shift in symptoms from heartburn to regurgitation. With impedance monitoring, the temporal association between symptoms that persist during inhibition of acid secretion and non-acid reflux events can be demonstrated. In a proportion of patients with chronic cough, the coughing episodes are preceded by non-acid reflux. Conclusions: Intraluminal impedance monitoring of gastro-oesophageal reflux is a feasible technique, which provides clinically important information about the relationships between symptoms and non-acid reflux events. © 2007 The Author.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smout, A. J. P. M. (2007). Review article: The measurement of non-acid gastro-oesophageal reflux. In Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics (Vol. 26, pp. 7–12). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03527.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free