Using discourse and conversation analysis to study clinical practice in adult mental health

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The discipline of clinical psychology has emerged from a largely positivist approach to understanding human behaviour (Kiyimba, 2015), and applied research for clinical psychologists has, for the most part, followed the quantitative tradition. Psychology, in the wider sense, historically positioned itself within the sciences, and as such the quantitative approach to measuring phenomena has tended to predominate (Peters, 2010). Thus, the move towards using qualitative approaches within psychological research has been relatively recent, despite the rich pedigree of this paradigm (Howitt, 2010). One of the aspects of this new appreciation of qualitative research has been an acknowledgement of the important role that understanding the processes in therapeutic encounters plays. This line of enquiry has facilitated an integration of the scientific ideals of good-quality research with actual clinical practice (Rhodes, 2011).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kiyimba, N. (2016). Using discourse and conversation analysis to study clinical practice in adult mental health. In The Palgrave Handbook of Adult Mental Health (pp. 45–63). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137496850_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free