Cost-utility analysis of rimonabant in the treatment of obesity

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of rimonabant 20 mg/day in the treatment of obesity from a third-party payer's perspective. Methods: Pooled data from three randomized clinical trials were used to develop a decision tree with five treatment alternatives: 1- and 2-year treatment with rimonabant, 2-year placebo, 1-year rimonabant followed by 1-year placebo, and no treatment. All alternatives, except no treatment, were accompanied by lifestyle interventions. Treatment benefits included gains in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and reduced incidence of type-2 diabetes mellitus and coronary heart disease (CHD). Drug acquisition cost was based on the average wholesale price of a comparator drug minus 15%. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the stability of the base-case results. Results: One-year rimonabant and 1-year rimonabant followed by placebo were extendedly dominated. Rimonabant for 2 years showed an average weight reduction of 8.49 kg, a body mass index reduction of 2.98 kg/m 2 and reduced waist circumference by 8.24 cm (placebo: 3.55 kg, 1.22 kg/m2, 4.18 cm). Two-year rimonabant was associated with a relative reduction in the 5-year incidence of CHD by 7.15% and of diabetes by 9.28%. Incremental benefits (costs) were 0.0984 QALYs ($5209) compared to no treatment and 0.0581 QALYs ($4182) compared to placebo, producing ICURs of $52,936/QALY (95% confidence interval $39K-$69K) and $71,973/QALY ($51K-$98K), respectively. Conclusions: Rimonabant combined with lifestyle interventions has the potential to decrease the rate of obesity-related comorbidities and improve health-related quality of life, albeit at considerable cost. © 2007, International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR).