Environmental Risk and Sustainability

  • Weiss B
  • Obi M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In 1999 the State of the Future Project of the United Nations University started a study on Environmental Security. The results of the study are documented in Glenn and Gorden [1-4]. The first issue that arrose involved definition. What is environmental security? It became clear that people (and governments) understood the term to mean three very different things. To ues US the work "security" indicated a military involvement. Environmental security to them thus meant any environmental issue with which the military may have to deal. This ranged from the environmental aspects of military bases, to the threat of warfare because of environmental issues such as water scarcity. To China, the term environmental security was synonymos with the protection of the environment. The third meaning of the term involved the security of people as a result of non-military assaults, such as global warming, on the environment. A similar confusion exists in relation to environmental risk. The two concepts (environmental risk and environmental security) are closely related. The word security implies a diminution of risk. Insecurity implies an increase in risk.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weiss, B., & Obi, M. (2016). Environmental Risk and Sustainability. In Environmental Risk Mitigation (pp. 9–32). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33957-3_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free