Ovarian Reserve Biomarkers and Menstrual Cycle Length in a Prospective Cohort Study

14Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Context: While age-related changes in menstrual cycle length are well known, it is unclear whether anti-Müllerian (AMH) or other ovarian reserve biomarkers have a direct association with cycle length. Objective: To determine the association between biomarkers of ovarian reserve and menstrual cycle length. Methods: Secondary analysis using data from time to conceive (TTC), a prospective time to pregnancy cohort study. The age-independent association between cycle length and biomarkers of ovarian reserve was analyzed using linear mixed and marginal models. Study participants were TTC-enrolled women aged 30-44 years with no history of infertility who were attempting to conceive for <3 months were enrolled. Serum AMH, follicle-stimulating hormone, and inhibin B levels were measured on cycle day 2, 3, or 4. Participants recorded daily menstrual cycle data for ≤4 months. The primary outcome was menstrual cycle length; follicular and luteal phase lengths were secondary outcomes. Results: Multivariable analysis included 1880 cycles from 632 women. Compared with AMH levels of 1.6 to 3.4 ng/mL, women with AMH <1.6 ng/mL had cycles and follicular phases that were 0.98 (95% CI-1.46,-0.50) and 1.58 days shorter (95% CI-2.53,-0.63), respectively, while women with AMH >8 ng/mL had cycles that were 2.15 days longer (95% CI 1.46, 2.83), follicular phases that were 2 days longer (95% CI 0.77, 3.24), and luteal phases that were 1.80 days longer (95% CI 0.71, 2.88). Conclusion: Increasing AMH levels are associated with longer menstrual cycles due to both a lengthening of the follicular and the luteal phase independent of age.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harris, B. S., Steiner, A. Z., & Jukic, A. M. (2021). Ovarian Reserve Biomarkers and Menstrual Cycle Length in a Prospective Cohort Study. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 106(9), E3748–E3759. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgab204

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free