Procalcitonin as an indicator of urosepsis

16Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Procalcitonin has been advocated as a marker of bacterial infection, so this study was carried out to determine the usefulness of serum procalcitonin in the early diagnosis of urosepsis. Methods: The subjects were 37 febrile patients with urinary tract infection in whom we examined the serum procalcitonin concentration at the start of treatment. Results: Thirty patients had acute pyelonephritis (16 simple, 14 complex), one had emphysematous pyelonephritis, five had acute prostatitis, and one had acute epididymitis. The procalcitonin level was <0.5 ng/mL in 18 patients, ≥0.5 ng/mL in one patient, ≥2 ng/mL in seven patients, and ≥10 ng/mL in 11 patients. Five of the 11 patients with procalcitonin levels ≥ 10 ng/mL had disseminated intravascular coagulation. All patients with urinary tract obstruction and disseminated intravascular coagulation had procalcitonin levels ≥ 10 ng/mL. Conclusion: Although this retrospective study comprised a small number of patients, we found that procalcitonin was a useful marker for urinary tract infection. © 2013 Sugimoto et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sugimoto, K., Adomi, S., Koike, H., & Esa, A. (2013). Procalcitonin as an indicator of urosepsis. Open Access Journal of Urology, 5(1), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S42711

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free