Gall-stone dissolution and recurrence: Are we being misled?

20Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Oral cholecystography repeated at six-month intervals is the standard method for determining reduction in size of gall stones (partial success) and complete dissolution of stones (complete success). In a comparative study of oral cholecystography and cholecystosonography six out of 14 patients with gall stones achieving complete success by oral cholecystographic criteria had stones still detectable by ultrasonography. Repeat oral cholecystography in a further 11 patients receiving post-dissolution maintenance treatment detected stones in two, whereas ultrasonography detected stones in seven. In future complete dissolution of gall stones should be reported only if both oral cholecystography and ultrasonographic studies give negative results and the progress of patients receiving post-dissolution maintenance treatment is monitored by ultrasonography rather than serial oral cholecystography.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Somerville, K. W., Rose, D. H., Bell, G. D., Ellis, W. R., & Knapp, D. R. (1982). Gall-stone dissolution and recurrence: Are we being misled? British Medical Journal, 284(6325), 1295–1297. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.284.6325.1295

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free