Auto-construction redux: The city as method

21Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article recuperates the concept of auto-construction as a heuristic for anthropological theory and method. Drawing on the concept's original usage in urban studies, I suggest that auto-construction offers a handle for grasping not only how grassroots projects mobilize resources, materials, and relations in ways that are inventive and transformative of urban ecologies but that it also helps outline how theory itself is auto-constructed: the operations of problematization through which situations are navigated and designed into methods of inquiry and exploration. I read autoconstruction, in other words, as both an empirical and theoretical descriptor, a sort of auto-heuristics for thinking of the city as method. The argument is illustrated by an ethnographic account of work with guerrilla architectural and countercultural collectives in Madrid, focusing in particular on the transformation of a vacant openair site in the heart of the city into a self-organized community project, exploring how activists variously problematized the city as method.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jiménez, A. C. (2017). Auto-construction redux: The city as method. Cultural Anthropology, 32(3), 450–478. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca32.3.09

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free