Functional outcomes after supracricoid laryngectomy: what do we not know and what do we need to know?

Abstract

Supracricoid laryngectomies (SCLs) are conservative organ-sparing surgical techniques for the treatment of selected T2–T4 laryngeal carcinomas. Although these procedures allow preserving the larynx and its functions, in several countries SCLs are not adopted in oncological protocols. One of the possible reasons to account for this choice is the complexity of post-surgical in-hospital management and the variability in functional results. The aim of this review is to analyse the literature on functional results after SCLs as knowledge on functional results will help in focusing on what is needed in the future to reach more standardized post-surgical procedures and homogeneous outcomes. The analysis of the length of hospital stay, feeding-tube removal time and time to eventual tracheotomy decannulation showed a marked variability across authors and centres. Several factors may come into play, including health-system organizations in different countries. In most studies in-depth description of the criteria applied for discharge, tracheotomy tube removal and commencement of oral feeding were not reported. Moreover, the review on swallowing functional outcomes showed marked variability, as well as a lack of consensus on how to assess swallowing after SCLs. The analysis of voice functional outcomes also revealed a marked variability; surprisingly, the tools applied in the assessments were very often not adequate for substitution voice. Literature review showed that voice- and swallowing-related quality of life are often satisfactory but the variability among centres is still too large. Therefore, there is a need for clearer clinical recommendations on early post-surgical management, tracheal-cannula and feeding-tube removal criteria, voice- and swallowing-assessment protocol, rehabilitation need and timing.