Practical approach for comparative analysis of multilesion molecular imaging using a semiautomated program for PET/CT

39Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We propose a standardized approach to quantitative molecular imaging (MI) in cancer patients with multiple lesions. Methods: Twenty patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer underwent 18F-FDG and 18F-16β-fluoro-5-dihydrotestosterone ( 18FFDHT) PET/CT scans. Using a 5-point confidence scale, 2 readers interpreted coregistered scan sets on a workstation. Two hundred three sites per scan (specified in a lexicon) were reviewed. 18FFDG-positive lesion bookmarks were propagated onto 18F-FDHT studies and then manually accepted or rejected. Discordancepositive 18F-FDHT lesions were similarly bookmarked. Lesional SUV max was recorded. Tracer- and tissue-specific background correction factors were calculated via receiver-operating- characteristic analysis of 65 scan sets. Results: Readers agreed on more than 99% of 18F-FDG- and 18F-FDHT-negative sites. Positive- site agreement was 83% and 85%, respectively. Consensuslesion maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max) was highly reproducible (concordance correlation coefficient > 0.98). Receiver-operating- characteristic curves yielded 4 correction factors (SUV max 1.8-2.6). A novel scatterplot (Larson-Fox-Gonen plot) depicted tumor burden and change in SUVmax for response assessments. Conclusion: Multilesion molecular imaging is optimized with a 5-step approach incorporating a confidence scale, site lexicon, semiautomated PET software, background correction, and Larson-Fox-Gonen graphing. Copyright © 2011 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fox, J. J., Autran-Blanc, E., Morris, M. J., Gavane, S., Nehmeh, S., Van Nuffel, A., … Larson, S. M. (2011). Practical approach for comparative analysis of multilesion molecular imaging using a semiautomated program for PET/CT. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 52(11), 1727–1732. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.111.089326

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free