Technological Learning, Institution Building and the Microeconomics of Import Substitution

  • Katz J
  • Kosacoff B
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Our characterization of the substitution process is definitely very different from that offered to us by the neo-classical mainstream in the profession, and covers a large number of dynamic historical factors which the neo-classical tradition simply misses. Rather than issues of static inefficiency in the alloca-tion of resources, our analysis places emphasis on long-term dynamic aspects related to the maturing of the society's internal technological capabilities. Just as in the case of technological learning, where a microeconomic approx-imation of the real world in developing countries allows us to identify and describe a great variety of facts and variables which the neo-classical research agenda simply leaves aside, the same happens when we approach the subject of institutional development. It is another `black box' about which conventional theory has little or nothing to say. We will explore this subject in the following

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Katz, J., & Kosacoff, B. (2000). Technological Learning, Institution Building and the Microeconomics of Import Substitution. In An Economic History of Twentieth-Century Latin America (pp. 36–57). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230595682_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free