Divergence of the world city system from national economies

6Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study shows that the position of cities in the world economy has diverged from national economies. Using data from 2016, we evaluate a network of 12,802 cities formed by the location decisions of 24,355 firms in terms of their point centrality, and show that the inter-city and inter-national systems have measurably decoupled, disrupting the previously-observed pattern in which the most powerful cities in the world city system were located in core countries, "mid-level" cities were in the semi-periphery,and the least powerful cities were in peripheral countries. Our findings support predictions that globalizing cities would diverge from national economies and that globalization would generate a new global geography that transects long-standing cleavages in the world system.

References Powered by Scopus

Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification

12778Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The World City Hypothesis

1946Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Models of core/periphery structures

1511Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

“Not so polycentric: The stratified structure & national drivers of transnational municipal networks”

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A network analysis of international migration: Longitudinal trends and antecedent factors predicting migration

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Overcoming gridlock? The role of city networks in transnational cooperation on climate mitigation

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leffel, B., Marahrens, H., & Alderson, A. S. (2023). Divergence of the world city system from national economies. Global Networks, 23(2), 459–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12405

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘2401234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

17%

Researcher 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 5

83%

Engineering 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0