Variation in the observed effect of Xpert MTB/RIF testing for tuberculosis on mortality: A systematic review and analysis of trial design considerations

3Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Most studies evaluating the effect of Xpert MTB/RIF testing for tuberculosis (TB) concluded that it did not reduce overall mortality compared to usual care. We conducted a systematic review to assess whether key study design and execution features contributed to earlier identification of patients with TB and decreased pre-treatment loss to follow-up, thereby reducing the potential impact of Xpert MTB/RIF testing. Methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, and Scopus for literature published from 1 st January 2009 to February 2019. We included all primary intervention studies that had evaluated the effect of Xpert MTB/RIF on mortality compared to usual care in participants with presumptive pulmonary TB. We critically reviewed features of included studies across: Study setting and context, Study population, Participant recruitment and enrolment, Study procedures, and Study follow-up. Results: We included seven randomised and one non-randomised study. All included studies demonstrated relative reductions in overall mortality in the Xpert MTB/RIF arm ranging from 6% to 40%. However, mortality reduction was reported to be statistically significant in two studies. Study features that could explain the lack of observed effect on mortality included: the higher quality of care at study sites; inclusion of patients with a higher pre-test probability of TB leading to higher than expected empirical rates; performance of additional diagnostic testing not done in usual care leading to increased TB diagnosis or empiric treatment initiation; the recruitment of participants likely to return for follow-up; and involvement of study staff in ensuring adherence with care and follow-up. Conclusion: Most studies of Xpert MTB/RIF were designed and conducted in a manner that resulted in more patients being diagnosed and treated for TB, minimising the potential difference in mortality Xpert MTB/RIF testing could have achieved compared to usual care.

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

53590Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Practical Clinical Trials: Increasing the Value of Clinical Research for Decision Making in Clinical and Health Policy

1550Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The PRECIS-2 tool: Designing trials that are fit for purpose

1294Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Impact of a multicomponent strategy including decentralized molecular testing for tuberculosis on mortality: planned analysis of a cluster-randomized trial in Uganda

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Estimating the effect of a rifampicin resistant tuberculosis diagnosis by the Xpert MTB/RIF assay on two-year mortality

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Research progress of Xpert MTB/RIF assay in the diagnosis of tuberculosis

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ochodo, E. A., Kalema, N., Schumacher, S., Steingart, K., Young, T., Mallett, S., … Cattamanchi, A. (2020). Variation in the observed effect of Xpert MTB/RIF testing for tuberculosis on mortality: A systematic review and analysis of trial design considerations. Wellcome Open Research, 4. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15412.2

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 3

60%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

40%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

50%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

17%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

17%

Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medic... 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free