Comparison of the sensitivity of three methods for the rapid identification of Cryptococcus neoformans

19Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The sensitivity of three methods for the rapid identification of Cryptococcus neoformans was compared. These were: direct microscopy of india ink preparations, acridine orange staining followed by fluorescence microscopy and detection of cryptococcal capsular polysaccharide antigen by latex agglutination. The overall limit of detection was 3.5 ± 5.4 x 103 CFU/ml (mean ± SD, n = 27). When different strains were studied, no single method was consistently superior. False positive results were rare (two of 162 observations, 1.2%) but there were eight false negatives (4.9%), five of which were with acridine orange. Tests such as these are an invaluable aid in the rapid diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis but they cannot be relied upon to detect low grade infections.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cohen, J. (1984). Comparison of the sensitivity of three methods for the rapid identification of Cryptococcus neoformans. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 37(3), 332–334. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.37.3.332

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free