Estimation of contrast agent bolus arrival delays for improved reproducibility of liver DCE MRI

11Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Delays between contrast agent (CA) arrival at the site of vascular input function (VIF) sampling and the tissue of interest affect dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI pharmacokinetic modelling. We investigate effects of altering VIF CA bolus arrival delays on liver DCE MRI perfusion parameters, propose an alternative approach to estimating delays and evaluate reproducibility. Thirteen healthy volunteers (28.7 ± 1.9 years, seven males) underwent liver DCE MRI using dual-input single compartment modelling, with reproducibility (n = 9) measured at 7 days. Effects of VIF CA bolus arrival delays were assessed for arterial and portal venous input functions. Delays were pre-estimated using linear regression, with restricted free modelling around the pre-estimated delay. Perfusion parameters and 7 days reproducibility were compared using this method, freely modelled delays and no delays using one-way ANOVA. Reproducibility was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis of agreement. Maximum percent change relative to parameters obtained using zero delays, were -31% for portal venous (PV) perfusion, +43% for total liver blood flow (TLBF), +3247% for hepatic arterial (HA) fraction, +150% for mean transit time and -10% for distribution volume. Differences were demonstrated between the 3 methods for PV perfusion (p = 0.0085) and HA fraction (p < 0.0001), but not other parameters. Improved mean differences and Bland-Altman 95% Limits-of-Agreement for reproducibility of PV perfusion (9.3 ml/min/100 g, ±506.1 ml/min/100 g) and TLBF (43.8 ml/min/100 g, ±586.7 ml/min/100 g) were demonstrated using pre-estimated delays with constrained free modelling. CA bolus arrival delays cause profound differences in liver DCE MRI quantification. Pre-estimation of delays with constrained free modelling improved 7 days reproducibility of perfusion parameters in volunteers.

References Powered by Scopus

Measurement of the blood‐brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts

1299Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Diagnosis of cirrhosis with intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI alone and in combination: Preliminary experience

342Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Tracer kinetic modelling in MRI: Estimating perfusion and capillary permeability

291Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in oncology: how we do it

79Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Realistic 4D MRI abdominal phantom for the evaluation and comparison of acquisition and reconstruction techniques

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Selection of Fitting Model and Arterial Input Function for Repeatability in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Prostate MRI

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chouhan, M. D., Bainbridge, A., Atkinson, D., Punwani, S., Mookerjee, R. P., Lythgoe, M. F., & Taylor, S. A. (2016). Estimation of contrast agent bolus arrival delays for improved reproducibility of liver DCE MRI. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 61(19), 6905–6918. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/61/19/6905

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

56%

Researcher 5

28%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 6

46%

Engineering 3

23%

Computer Science 2

15%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

15%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free