Comparing a scanning ambiguous keyboard to the on-screen QWERTY keyboard

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper explores text entry on a scanning ambiguous keyboard (SAK) and the Windows on-screen keyboard (OSK) operating in scanning mode. The SPACEBAR was used for physical input with both keyboards. Testing involved 12 participants entering five phrases of text with each keyboard. On entry speed, the means were 5.06 wpm for the SAK and 2.67 wpm for the OSK, thus revealing a significant speed advantage for the SAK. However, the character-level error rate of 13.3% for the SAK was significantly higher than the error rate of 2.4% for the OSK. On subjective preference, 7 of 12 participants preferred the Windows OSK over the SAK, citing familiarity with the QWERTY layout as the most common reason. However, participants appreciated the efficiency of the SAK keyboard. A limitation of the results is the small amount of text entered.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Waddington, C. T., MacKenzie, I. S., Read, J. C., & Horton, M. (2017). Comparing a scanning ambiguous keyboard to the on-screen QWERTY keyboard. In HCI 2017: Digital Make Believe - Proceedings of the 31st International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference, HCI 2017 (Vol. 2017-July). BCS Learning and Development Ltd. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/HCI2017.103

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free