Analysis of systems structural relationships through a DSM-based approach

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

DSMs and related matrices are commonly used to represent system interfaces, which is closely associated with a need to decompose systems into their elements. However, besides the importance of managing the decomposed elements of systems, the systems engineer should also possess a capability to manage other systems' relationships. In this paper we are focusing on the DSM capability to represent three fundamental system entities and four structural relationships, as they are defined in the Object-Process Methodology. We argue that DSM is an appropriate tool to facilitate a systematic approach to digital transformation of objects and processes through the different stages of the design process. We use a coffee maker as a case study demonstrating how each entity flows from an abstract environment to a more detailed one following specific structural relationships.

References Powered by Scopus

DESIGN STRUCTURE SYSTEM: A METHOD FOR MANAGING THE DESIGN OF COMPLEX SYSTEMS.

1582Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: A review and new directions

1454Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Structural complexity management: An approach for the field of product design

567Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Interface Management for Telecommunication System Design through OPM and DSM-based Approaches

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Menshenin, Y., Brovar, Y., Crawley, E., & Fortin, C. (2020). Analysis of systems structural relationships through a DSM-based approach. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Dependency and Structure Modeling Conference, DSM 2020 (pp. 43–51). The Design Society. https://doi.org/10.35199/dsm2020.5

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

50%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

25%

Researcher 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 2

40%

Design 1

20%

Engineering 1

20%

Computer Science 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free